INTERMETANET

INTERMETANETINTERMETANETINTERMETANET

INTERMETANET

INTERMETANETINTERMETANETINTERMETANET
  • Home
  • Membership Subscription
  • Field Reports
  • Finance Tool
  • Strategy
  • Press
  • Business Model
  • Advantage
  • Intermetanet
  • Research
  • Postdoc
  • Peer Evaluations
  • Positioning
  • Real Estate
  • Counsel
  • Justice
  • Mission
  • MVP
  • Terrorism
  • Safe Harbor
  • Surplus
  • Disclaimer
  • More
    • Home
    • Membership Subscription
    • Field Reports
    • Finance Tool
    • Strategy
    • Press
    • Business Model
    • Advantage
    • Intermetanet
    • Research
    • Postdoc
    • Peer Evaluations
    • Positioning
    • Real Estate
    • Counsel
    • Justice
    • Mission
    • MVP
    • Terrorism
    • Safe Harbor
    • Surplus
    • Disclaimer
  • Home
  • Membership Subscription
  • Field Reports
  • Finance Tool
  • Strategy
  • Press
  • Business Model
  • Advantage
  • Intermetanet
  • Research
  • Postdoc
  • Peer Evaluations
  • Positioning
  • Real Estate
  • Counsel
  • Justice
  • Mission
  • MVP
  • Terrorism
  • Safe Harbor
  • Surplus
  • Disclaimer

Research Critiques

WHERE IDEAS ARE CHALLENGED. WHERE TRUTH PREVAILS

Every scientific theory, philosophical argument, and technological innovation deserves rigorous scrutiny. The Peer Rebuttals section invites qualified researchers, analysts, engineers, and subject-matter experts to critically evaluate the work of Dr. Blake A. Myers and other Rousix contributors through evidence-based analysis, logical reasoning, and transparent scholarly discourse. By encouraging informed criticism and intellectual debate, Rousix publishes its research to foster constructive analysis, refine its technologies, and advance knowledge through the highest standards of academic integrity.

Reassessing Myers' Paradox

  • The enclosed analysis presents Graham Priest’s dialetheic response to a paradox developed by Blake Myers. It argues that the paradoxical argument is invalid when evaluated within paraconsistent logics such as the Logic of Paradox or First-Degree Entailment, because key inferences such as disjunctive syllogism fail in those systems. The paper does not show that the argument is invalid in classical logic; Priest explicitly leaves the classical assessment unresolved.

Download PDF

The Architecture of Dispositional Belief

  • This paper defends the traditional view that knowledge entails belief by responding to experimental work by Blake Myers and Eric Schwitzgebel. Rose and Schaffer argue that apparent cases of knowledge without belief involve a lack of occurrent belief, not dispositional belief, and present new studies suggesting that once this distinction is made explicit, ordinary judgments support the claim that knowledge entails dispositional belief.

Download PDF

The Cognitive Architecture of Conviction

  • This paper builds on experimental work by Blake Myers and Eric Schwitzgebel challenging the traditional claim that knowledge entails belief. Through studies involving God, a dog, a cash register, and a human subject, the authors find that people sometimes attribute knowledge without belief and propose a “conviction account,” according to which belief, but not knowledge, requires mental assent.

Download PDF

The Cognitive Dynamics of Belief Ascription

  • This analysis presents experimental evidence that the Knobe effect extends to belief ascriptions: people are more likely to attribute belief, stronger belief, rational belief, and dispositional belief when an agent produces a negative rather than a positive side effect. It also provides additional support for the challenge raised by Blake Myers and Eric Schwitzgebel to the traditional claim that knowledge entails belief.

Download PDF

Rethinking the Knowledge-Belief Relation

  • The enclosed research analysis distinguishes between thin belief, understood as the representation of a proposition as true, and thick belief, which additionally incorporates elements such as conscious assent, emotion, or practical commitment. Building on the experimental challenge advanced by Blake Myers and Eric Schwitzgebel, the authors argue that, although knowledge may fail to entail thick belief, it does entail thin belief—a conclusion supported by their experimental findings.

Download PDF

Copyright © 2017 Rousix ICCF Inc. All rights reserved.

  • Membership Subscription